Repairs and diagnostics
Professional help when a robot has a technical problem.
Independent owner inquiry
Willow deserves more than uncertainty. Before approaching investors, we need honest evidence that owners want reliable paid repairs, maintenance and support, and that a sustainable service can earn its future.

Why this matters
Every Willow still working is a reason to explore what comes next. Skilled people, practical operations and serious investment could create continuity, but only owners can show whether the demand is real. Your view helps turn hope into evidence.
Professional help when a robot has a technical problem.
Practical continuity for owners who want to keep Willow working.
Possible future robot improvements, only if rights, access, funding and feasibility allow it.
The boundaries
Wesley’s role
Wesley founded EEVE and is organising this independent inquiry because he wants owners to have a credible path to keep using their Willow. While the initiative remains limited to keeping existing robots in service, he will not draw a salary from that service activity. Its income would fund the people and operations delivering the service. Any future role or compensation connected to broader activities, such as new software, services or products, would be separate from this Willow service and outside the scope of this inquiry.
FAQ
The full context, including the difficult parts, before you decide whether to participate.
A reliable service would require people, tools, processes and capital. Demand must be demonstrated before asking investors to support it.
Wesley Lorrez is organising it to understand whether Willow owners have enough serious demand for a viable service. The inquiry gathers evidence; it does not itself launch or promise that service.
Yes. He is organising this inquiry because he wants to test whether owners have enough serious demand for a viable service. This does not give him access to estate assets or authority over the bankruptcy process.
The groups are a practical way to let relevant owners know that the inquiry exists. Participation is voluntary. A group does not operate or endorse the initiative merely because the invitation is shared there.
No access to EEVE source code, robot software or other estate assets is assumed. Any future activity would depend on the necessary legal rights, practical access, funding and feasibility.
No. This inquiry tests whether a credible case exists. A service would still require a workable legal, operational and financial structure.
No. The inquiry separately measures interest in longer-term improvement. Any development would depend on rights, technical access, funding and a sustainable organisation.
A service cannot be designed responsibly without understanding what owners value and what they could realistically pay. The amounts are research ranges, not prices or quotations.
No. Every answer is non-binding. It helps measure demand but creates no purchase obligation.
The evidence may show that a sustainable service cannot be justified. That is still a valuable result and prevents premature promises or investment.
No. No payment is requested. This is a viability inquiry into a possible paid service and longer-term continuity.
Only the minimum information needed to validate and analyse the inquiry is collected. Results may be presented in aggregate. Personal identities will not be shown to investors, and the data will not be sold or reused for unrelated marketing.
Willow Service Inquiry
If you own a Willow, your experience belongs in the case we build. Tell us what kind of service would matter and what a fair model could look like. Every honest answer makes the next decision stronger.